What Is a Follower Now?

Photography, social media, and what a “follower” still means on TikTok, VERO and Glass.

A few weeks ago, I opened a TikTok account from scratch for a test.

I did not expect much from it. Photography is not an obvious fit for a platform built around short videos, and nobody there knew my work. I began with simple posts: one photograph, a few words, sometimes a question.

After 56 posts, the account had reached 348 followers and received more than 2,200 likes.

These are not remarkable numbers by TikTok standards. What surprised me was how quickly they appeared. Most posts were shown to people who had never seen my work before. The account did not need a history. Each post could circulate on its own.

My first photograph on VERO dates from August 22, 2022.

I joined at a time when criticism of Instagram was growing among photographers. The chronological feed had largely disappeared, and following someone no longer meant that their work would actually appear in front of you.

I recognised that frustration. VERO seemed closer to what I still expected from a social network: choosing whose work I wanted to see, then seeing it.

I was active for nearly two years, then stopped posting between May 2024 and September 2025. When I returned, many of the names were still familiar, but the platform felt quieter.

Today I have around 1,140 followers there. Most photographs receive between 120 and 160 likes, sometimes fewer, especially videos.

More important than the numbers are the names. Over time, I have come to recognise many of them. Some people have been commenting on my work for a long time. I know what they photograph, how often they post, and sometimes I notice when their work begins to move in another direction.

VERO still works as a chronological feed. When I follow someone, I can normally expect to see what they publish. Glass works in much the same way, though its discovery page lets me browse by category rather than just follow the timeline.

This is close to what photographers often say they want from a social network.

And yet both platforms feel quieter now.

Following someone used to carry a simple expectation: I had chosen to see more of their work.

That included the strong photographs, but also the less immediate ones. I could see repetitions, changes of direction and ideas that developed slowly. The meaning of one photograph sometimes depended on having seen the earlier ones.

The larger platforms work differently.

I can follow someone and still not see what they publish next. At the same time, photographs from people I have never encountered appear constantly in front of me.

This is almost certainly why a new TikTok account can grow so much faster than a new account on VERO or Glass.

That reach is real. What it represents is less clear to me. A person may stop for one photograph, press follow, and never see another.

The number remains visible on the profile. It still gives the impression of an audience waiting for the next post. In practice, the platform keeps deciding which of those people will actually see it.

A follower is no longer necessarily someone I can reach.

On VERO, the change has been gradual.

There was no single moment when everyone left. Some people began posting less often. A few familiar names stopped appearing. Comments became concentrated among a smaller group. The feed still moved, but not quite as it had before.

On Instagram or TikTok, that kind of absence is easy to miss. Another photograph appears immediately. Another account takes the place. The flow continues, and there is no empty space to notice.

VERO does not hide that in the same way.

When someone stops posting, nobody automatically replaces them in my feed. The silence remains visible.

That may be one reason a chronological network can feel as though it is declining faster than an algorithmic one. The decline may be real, but it is also exposed. The platform does not keep producing the impression that everyone is still there.

A network built around existing relationships can be hard to enter. On VERO or Glass, a newcomer may arrive in a place where many photographers have known one another for years. It takes time to become part of that conversation.

TikTok does not ask for that time. It tests the post first. Whether people remember the account comes later.

I still do not know what the 348 followers on TikTok will mean for the next photograph.

On VERO, some of the same names have been there since 2022.

Lately, I also notice the ones that are no longer there.

I still don't know if a network built this way can last, or if it will simply grow quieter until only the names remain.

For now, I stay. I won't know for a while what that was worth.


The photographs are gathered here:
Selected Photography

Comments

  1. Good afternoon again from Japan Philippe,
    It appears our thought trains are on parallel tracks. While VERO was wonderful when I first joined almost three years ago, its very essence and “personality” has been changing at an increasing rate…and not for the better. The 3 large hubs, obsessed with their own mis-guided self-importance have become little more than “social media influencer wanna-be’s” who are interested less in credible photography which actually reflects the hub’s stated theme/focus than with perpetuating their moderators’ little group of sycophant friends.

    I have tried GLASS in the past but ended up finding it under-resourced, poorly designed and ultimately not worth the cost of subscription. Have they improved upon those shortcomings? Can you share what is it about GLASS that you find of value vis-a-viz Photography?

    I watched a YouTube video last night by Evan Ranft dealing with the phenomenon of photographers abandoning social media out of algorithm madness and diminishing returns for those of us who truly engage in our craft for the love of it and in the increasingly frustrating search for like-minded individuals . I’d love to hear your take on this as I am growing ever more dis-llusioned with VERO (as well as IG) and other so-called “Photography” media opportunities. The one place that has pleasantly surprised me so far is FOTO…if you haven’t checked it out, it might be worth your time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, David, for taking the time to write such a thoughtful comment.
      Your description of VERO is close to what I have been feeling too. The platform still has real qualities, but the conversation has become more concentrated around a smaller group of active users.
      I am also mixed about Glass. It offers limited visibility and discovery, so I understand why the subscription may not feel justified. At the same time, several photographers whose work I value are still active there, and I continue to appreciate that smaller and quieter community.
      The wider fatigue you mention is probably real too. Many photographers seem tired of constantly feeding platforms whose priorities have little to do with photography.
      I do not know FOTO, so I cannot compare it yet, but your experience makes me curious. What do you find there that you no longer find elsewhere?

      Delete
  2. Good article Philippe, thanks for that. I’m from Amsterdam but have been living in a village for a few years now. In the city, when new neighbors move in, you hardly notice it; life is more anonymous. In the village, you drop by to introduce yourself to your new neighbors—they are visible.
    That’s how various social media platforms feel to me, too; that’s why I’m venturing onto VERO again—a quiet place with visible people.
    Amusingly Entourage I could only respond anonymously, but I hope that is just a technical problem ;-)
    Kind regards, Cécile Truijens.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Cécile.
      I like your comparison with village life. On algorithmic platforms, we are constantly introduced to new people, but often without ever getting to know them. VERO is quieter, but the people remain visible, and over time some of them become familiar.
      And thank you for signing your comment. Blogger’s identity system is far more complicated than it should be, so adding a name or username at the end is probably the simplest solution.

      Delete
  3. Thank for this article. I guess everyone may have different expectations as far as social media is concerned. When I joined Vero on 22/12/2023 I found for once a social media that meets my requirements. Genuine interactions, mutual support and inspiring accounts. The hub concept is also fantastic especially when you join Vero as it can give you a wider audience. I joined Vero after being completely disappointed by the algorithms of Instagram - my IG account was regurlarly blocked as I was “too active”! I also lost an account with more than 11k users on IG - 1.5 years of work lost that I had never retrieved ! I have never tried TikTok so I cannot comment on this one and I wish you all the best on TikTok too.
    My personal view on social media’s in general is that audiences are usually not the same, interactions are different. IG for instance is really a headache with many trying to follow you and unfollow after a few days just to grow ! I hate this kind of behaviour and decide to block anyone with this behaviour. On Vero I really found what I was looking as there are many ways to discover new amazing accounts and talented photographers. I guess with this 2.5 years of experience with Vero, I was able to grow at a slow but genuine pace - which is fine.
    Have a wonderful day

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Stéphanie. I agree that people can expect very different things from a social network. What you describe is one of VERO’s real strengths: slower growth, perhaps, but often more genuine interactions and a stronger sense of continuity.
      Your experience with Instagram also shows how fragile these platforms can be. An audience can disappear, accounts can be blocked, and the follow/unfollow behaviour makes the numbers difficult to interpret.
      Thank you for sharing your experience, and for taking the time to comment on the blog.

      Delete
  4. Very interesting article. I think it the depends on what people feel the purpose of being a follower is. If they truly appreciate a photographer's work it is a good way to keep in touch and see future work from them (if the algorithm permits). The other type of follower is someone who follows people with the hope and expectation they will follow back. That's desirable to boost their numbers which sadly to many is more important than seeing good photography. It seems there are a lot of people who want to become "influencers" and think inflated and meaningless follower numbers will get them there.

    I'm on Glass and Vero. I prefer Glass the best because the don't tally likes and there are no hubs - it's all about the photography and community. The downside with both is the smaller audience then IG and Tik Toc. Glass in particular is a very small group but I would still prefer quality over quantity.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you Mike. I think your distinction between following a body of work and following in expectation of a return is an important one.
      It may also explain why the same number can mean very different things from one platform to another. On Glass, the smaller scale can feel limiting, but perhaps it also makes the intention behind following someone a little clearer.
      I agree that quality and continuity matter more than inflated numbers.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Thoughtful and respectful comments are welcome. If Blogger identifies you as Anonymous in case you have no google account, please add your name or username at the end of your comment.